1.00 I came to RGC because of www.artmap.org.uk in which I created the " the man in the map ", a conceptual device and a metaphor for our own participation within an environment - a species in its habitat.
1.01 The way I have approached RGC is from the perspective of the man in the map, who is able to comprehend the map he is part of, he can see him self within the map in his minds eye. And from here he can cleave experiential extracts from his experience within the map with which to construct meaning...
1.02 This is a phenomenological perspective and a practice led approach. The art is the attempt at deconstruction and reverse engineering, perhaps also constituting a form of literalism.
1.03 The first dilemma is that there is no one in the map, no visible person in the Google apparatus to take care and through whom all the corresponding attendances, a 'point of view' affords upon a scheme, can happen. - Image theft seems the least but start of it.
1.04 By inserting the concerns of man and woman into Google Street View, a critique emerges and plays out - these are the discoveries and expectations of one who finds no end of reason to Reverse the Google Car...
As Usman Haque says maybe google-hacking / reverse-engineering become a genre of its own right!